Search for collections on Repository Universitas Peradaban

PRAGMATIC ANALYSIS OF EXPRESSIVE UTTERANCES USED BY JURIES COMMENT ON THE U.S.A X-FACTOR SEASON 1

Sulaiman, Mirza Eman (NIM.40114034) (2019) PRAGMATIC ANALYSIS OF EXPRESSIVE UTTERANCES USED BY JURIES COMMENT ON THE U.S.A X-FACTOR SEASON 1. Bachelor thesis, Universitas Peradaban.

[img]
Preview
Text
40114034_Halaman_Judul.pdf - Accepted Version

Download (525kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
40114034_Bab1.pdf - Accepted Version

Download (183kB) | Preview
[img] Text
40114034_Bab2.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Registered users only until 30 September 2026.

Download (338kB)
[img]
Preview
Text
40114034_Bab3.pdf - Accepted Version

Download (165kB) | Preview
[img] Text
40114034_Bab4.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Registered users only until 30 September 2026.

Download (587kB)
[img]
Preview
Text
40114034_Bab5.pdf - Accepted Version

Download (88kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
40114034_Daftar_Pustaka.pdf - Accepted Version

Download (161kB) | Preview
[img] Text
40114034_Lampiran.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only until 30 September 2026.

Download (206kB)
[img] Text
40114034_Artikel.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Registered users only until 30 September 2026.

Download (277kB)

Abstract

The aim of this study is to analyse kind of expressive utterance used by juries comment on the U.S.A X-Factor Season 1. This research is descriptive qualitative method. Then, the writer uses theory from Searle (1979) to analyze Expressive Utterance. The source of data in this research is from U.S.A X-Factor Season 1 video that have been analyse into transcript. The writer use some technique to analyze the data: download the video from website, watch the video, transcribe the video by using documentation technique and applying Simak Bebas Libat Cakap (SLBC) method to process the data, rewrite the transcript into sentence by using segmenting immediate constituent technique (Teknik Bagi Unsur Langsung), identify the expressive utterance, describe the analysis, and draw the conclusion. From the finding of analysis, the writer find out 150 expressive utterance which include 10 aplogize utterances, 8 thanking utterances, 7 congratulate utterances, 36 complain utterances, 17 protest utterances, 1 deplore utterance, 2 boast utterance, 57 compliment utterances, and 12 welcome utterances. In addition, there are 2 kind expressive utterance that not found by the writer in this analysis, that is condole expression and lament expression.

Item Type: Thesis (Bachelor)
Contributors:
ContributionContributorsNIDN/NIDK
Thesis advisorMurtiningsih, Dra., M.Pd., Sri (NIDN.0611096501)UNSPECIFIED
ExaminerNurdiawati, M.Pd., Dede (NIDN.0607038104)UNSPECIFIED
ExaminerHakim, M.Pd., Muh. Ilhami (NIDN.0611038UNSPECIFIED
Additional Information: Dosen Pembimbing : Dra. Sri Murtiningsih, M.Pd. (NIDN..0611096501)
Uncontrolled Keywords: Pragmatic Analysis, Expressive Utterance, Juries Comment, U.S.A X-Factor
Subjects: 400 Ilmu Bahasa, Kebahasaan > Filsafat dan Teori Bahasa > Semiotics, Discourse Analysis, Semantics
Divisions: Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan > Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris - S1
Depositing User: Nidzom Muhammad
Date Deposited: 23 Dec 2019 07:11
Last Modified: 23 Dec 2019 07:11
URI: http://eprints.peradaban.ac.id/id/eprint/678

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item